Hulk Hogan has recently announced that he is divorcing his wife. The court documents provide an interesting look into the end of a celebrity marriage, and some of the most interesting information involves property division. In many ways, a celebrity divorce is not all that much different from any other divorce. There is, however, a much greater chance of expensive assets trading hands and being divided. In this particular divorce, it seems as though the spouses chose to trade assets. This is often a much more favorable method than liquidating assets and splitting the proceeds.
Hulk Fans Shocked by Divorce Announcement
Part of the reason Hulk’s divorce made the headlines was because of its unexpected nature. For the longest time, his fans were under the impression that he was still married. It was only when Hogan started posting pictures of himself with a new girlfriend that fans began asking questions. After being pestered by incessant comments about his wife, Hogan was forced to clarify the situation and announce publicly that he had obtained a divorce.
A Look Into the Property Division Process
Hulk apparently agreed to pay for a new car for his ex-wife. The brand of the vehicle was not specified, but the agreement made it very clear that his ex was not to make any car payments whatsoever. In exchange for this vehicle, Hogan was able to maintain ownership of his own vehicle, which he had shared with his wife during the marriage. This is a classic example of trading assets. This means that one spouse keeps assets while offering another asset of equal value in return. This negates the need to liquidate assets in order to split the proceeds, which can be unfavorable for a number of reasons. One must assume that this particular vehicle held sentimental value for Hogan. Otherwise, he may have simply sold the vehicle to make the process easier.
A similar scenario played out with two properties owned by the spouses. During the marriage, Hulk and his wife purchased a property together in Palm Isle, Florida. His wife is keeping this property, while he is retaining ownership of his mansion in Clearwater. This is essentially the same system of “trading” assets – but this time homes are switching hands instead of cars.
Finally, Hulk is apparently paying his wife a lump-sum amount for alimony, but this amount was not disclosed. All in all, it seems like a pretty amicable split – especially when you consider that the spouses filed and responded to the divorce papers in a relatively short amount of time. This suggests that both spouses simply wanted to finalize the divorce and move on with their lives.
Trading vs. Selling Assets During a Divorce
At the end of the day, there is no “best” way to handle assets during a divorce. Trading certainly has its advantages, but selling might also be the right choice for certain spouses. Along with the sentimental value of various assets, one must also consider any potential tax burdens associated with selling.
About the author